Wednesday, August 26, 2020

How Did the Tsar Survive the 1905 Revolution Free Essays

In spite of the disappointment of Russia in the war against Japan, the Tsarist system endure the upset . There are various explanations behind this. One of the most importants reason is that Nicholas II was very gratitude to his military power. We will compose a custom article test on How Did the Tsar Survive the 1905 Revolution or on the other hand any comparative theme just for you Request Now Before the finish of January there were in excess of 400,000 laborers out protesting. The 1905 Revolution was in progress. For the remainder of the year the legislature had little control of occasions, as strikes, shows, petitions, peasent uprisisings, understudies uproars, and deaths got ordinary. The Tsar was â€Å"at war with his own people†. Individuals needed a change since Nicholas II rule saw Imperial Russia go from being one of the extraordinary forces of the world to a financial and military debacle. Nicholas moved toward the Russo-Japanese war with certainty and considered it to be a chance to raise Russian resolve and energy, giving little consideration to the funds of a significant distance war. In the blink of an eye before the Japanese assault on Port Arthur, Nicholas held solid to the conviction that there would be no war. Nicholas anticipated a last triumph. Numerous individuals took the Tsar’s certainty; trusting him to be totally impenetrable As Russia kept on confronting rout by the Japanese, the call for harmony developed. Nicholas’s own mom, encouraged Nicholas to open harmony arrangements. In spite of the endeavors for harmony, Nicholas stayed shifty. It was not until 27â€28 March and the demolition of the Russian armada by the Japanese, that Nicholas at long last chose to seek after harmony. Individuals had no more confidence in the Tsar that lost to a nation significantly more little than his own. In September after the harmony bargain with Japan, a huge number of troops were currently allowed to help put down the turmoil in European Russia. The legislature paid them all their back compensation and guaranteed better states of administration with the goal that they would stay faithful to the Tsar. The Tsar had the decision of surrendering or utilizing power. He surrendered and gave the October Manifesto on the 30 October 1905. This guaranteed: - A Parliament or Duma chose by the individuals †Civil rights-e. g. Freedom of discourse and still, small voice †Uncensored papers and the option to frame ideological groups. The liberal and white collar classes accepted they had won law based government. They halted their fights and upheld their legislature. By December, with all the soldiers back in Russia, the Tsar felt sufficiently able to reclaim the control. He utilized power to shut down the St Petersburg Soviet and smash an arm uprising in Moscow. He conveyed troops to render retribution on laborers and workers who had revolted and manage them. The ideological groups that were against the Tsar were without question, and most likely on the off chance that they had framed just a couple of the Tsar would have not endure the 1905 Revolution. All the ideological groups needed to crush the Tsar yet they needed to vanquish him themselves and not other ideological groups. Nicholas felt that he, as Tsar, administered through celestial right from God. A portion of his comrades were humiliated at the manner in which Nicholas administered Russia, and this influenced his home life. He likewise felt that individuals who couldn't help contradicting him were deceivers. Nicholas was then approached to leave. With much hesitance, he renounced. He and his family were detained. Inevitably, every one of them were fiercely killed. Their bodies were scorched and afterward tossed into an unfilled shaft. The Tsar had different reasons why he endure and most likely without the assistance of the military the Tsar would have been vanquished quickly, and if the individuals that were against the Tsar were more savvy they could have won. The most effective method to refer to How Did the Tsar Survive the 1905 Revolution, Essay models

Friday, August 21, 2020

Final Forty-Five

Final Forty-Five Add Date the last date on which you can add a class is this Friday, so I thought itd be an opportune time to discuss the classes I’m taking this term. I’m taking a total of 45 credits, the fewest credits I’ve ever taken at MIT. Part of the reason for that is that one of my classes (1.013) has a four-hour lab 12-4pm on Wednesday, which blocks out a lot of other classes. For that reason, 21F.702 (Spanish II) and 14.02 (Macroeconomics), two candidates for a fifth class, were not truly feasible. But, I’m a second semester senior! I’ll enjoy the extra time this term, even though it’ll still be less leisurely than last term, when I didn’t have class until 1pm any day of the week. 1.011 â€" Project Evaluation (9 credits) Required by all Course IC students (although generally taken during junior year), the aim of this course is to provide the tools engineers need to evaluate projects and determine whether they are worthwhile and feasible (from environmental, social, and financial standpoints). Over the past couple weeks, the course has been heavily focused on the financial aspects, which I am, to some extent, quite grateful for, considering I couldnt fit 14.02 into my schedule. 1.013 â€" Senior Civil and Environmental Engineering Design (12 credits) As you can imagine, this is that big class that is supposed to cap off your four-year experience in Civil and Environmental Engineering. This is considered a reunion of sorts, as all the Course I seniors, regardless of whether they focused in civil engineering or environmental engineering, or transportation, structures, or geotechnics, come back together for this one final class. There are a number of people in the class who I honestly havent seen since sophomore year. The class has a few small projects throughout the term, but the main outcome of the class is a report on one of three real issues â€" the renovation of MIT’s Sailing Pavilion, the revitalization in South Florida’s Cowbone Marsh, and the improvement of South Florida’s coastal structures. I’m working on the last project, and the a couple people from the South Florida Water Management District came up to MIT two weeks ago to tell us about the project. They even said that if we happened to be in Miami during Spring Break, they could show us the waterways by helicopter (tempting offer, I know…). 1.041 â€" Transportation Systems (12 credits) Although I have had a longtime interest in transportation, this is my first transportation course ever. So far, we’ve done a lot of MATLAB modeling of networks, car following dynamics, and, now, GIS. Easily the best moment of the class was when our TA last Wednesday asked for feedback on the problem set and someone sternly remarked that if he says an assignment is due Wednesday (as it was), it should not be due at 1:00am. Indeed, I hadn’t started the assignment by 10pm and had to cancel my quick nap when he “reminded” us (via e-mail) that it was due in three hours. Our TA took the comment rather well, but now whenever he mentions a due date for a problem set, everyone in the class responds, “What time?” He’s never going to live that one down. 4.440 â€" Building Structural Systems I (12 credits) The only course I’m taking this semester that isn’t required for Course I, I was drawn to the class by the lab component (three hours on Fridays) and the architectural angle of the course. Aside from a seminar-style Islamic architecture course last term, I haven’t taken a single architecture course during my time at MIT (and I think its important for civil engineers to meet their architect comrades). While some of the concepts are a bit basic for a civil engineering senior (as I was forewarned), the course has begun to teach me some nifty graphical concepts that would be useful in civil engineering, but which, for some reason, have been left out of curriculum. The professor noted that he has long thought the course should be required for civil engineering sophomores (when the engineering concepts aren’t so basic). Also, I am looking forward to our design projects, where we build structural elements and models. On Friday, we completed our first such project. We had to building a balsa wood column 12-36 inches tall and less than five inches in diameter. Prizes were to be awarded for the column that could withstand the greatest load relative to weight and greatest load multiplied by its height squared (to encourage people to build taller). The undergraduates, for some reason, were seriously outperformed by the graduate students. Seriously. Take a look at our creations: And here is my pairs structure being tested and destroyed The undergraduates’ strongest column held 2,147 lb, but it was widely believed to be outside the regulations because it was cut from sheets of balsa wood, rather than from strips of wood. Ignoring that one, the strongest column among the fourteen undergraduate teams belonged to myself and classmate Adam ’11; our column held 1,202 lb. Somehow, though, that figure was bested by six of the twelve graduate student teams, with their strongest column holding an unbelievable 5,268 lbs! Balsa wood! We held the highest pressure-per-column-mass ratio among the undergraduates (with 24.2 lbs/g; yes, I know the units are painful), but we were â€" again â€" outdone by one of the graduate teams, whose column had a pressure-per-mass ratio of 59.1 lbs/g. Their column was also the lightest of all, coming in at a shockingly light 16 grams (the heaviest were above 250 grams).

Sunday, May 24, 2020

Rumors Problems in To Kill a Mockingbird - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 890 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/02/20 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: To Kill a Mockingbird Essay Did you like this example? School can become a little overrated when it comes to real life issues and real-life lessons. In To A Mockingbird, it really shows that you learn more important life lessons outside of school. In this story, she learned that you shouldnt let rumors control you, that sometimes you have to suck it up and just deal with a problem and to look in others perspective. Rumors are a big problem in everyday life but specifically, in this story, it is a big part. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Rumors Problems in To Kill a Mockingbird" essay for you Create order On page 163 Jem saysâ€Å"That’s just his way,† â€Å"They say he never got over his weddin‘. He was supposed to marry one of the—the Spencer ladies, I think. They were gonna have a huge weddin’, but they didn’t—after the rehearsal, the bride went upstairs and blew her head off. Shotgun. She pulled the trigger with her toes.†. This is important because it puts a negative image on Mr. Raymond and tries to make him look either depressed, crazy, or both. The second example is on page 204 when Mr. Raymond talks about how its just soda, â€Å"Yes ma’am,† Mr. Raymond nodded. I liked his smell: it was of leather, horses, cottonseed. He wore the only English riding boots I had ever seen. â€Å"That’s all I drink, most of the time.† â€Å"Then you just pretend you’re half—? I beg your pardon, sir,† I caught myself. â€Å"I didn’t mean to be—†. This is important because it shows how everyone negative perception makes him have to look like he is drinking so they wont bother him. Finally on page 8 through 12 scout talks about what she heard about Boo Radley and how everyone is afraid of him. At the end of the story, it basically shows that it was all a hoax and that actually he is a really good person that doesnt deserve any of that. Rumors are what this story starts with and what it will eventually end with. The next reason is a lesson she mainly learned from her father which is sometimes you have to suck it up and things that others wont. The first example of this is when Mrs. Maudie tells Jem on page 219 â€Å"I simply want to tell you that there are some men in this world who were born to do our unpleasant jobs for us. Your father’s one of them†. In this quote, it shows how Atticus had to take on a job that he knew he wasnt going to win. On page 219 Mrs. Maudie tells Jem and Scout â€Å"His colored friends for one thing and people like us. People like Judge Taylor. People like Mr. Heck Tate. Stop eating and start thinking Jem. Did it ever strike you that Judge Taylor naming Atticus to defend that boy was no accident? That Judge Taylor might have had his reasons for naming him?†. That shows how Atticus was given this job because he was the fittest for the job and that he has support to back him up even though everyone knew he was going to lose. The last example is on page 216 when Atticus talks about the case â€Å"I don’t know, but they did it. They’ve done it before and they did it tonight and they’ll do it again and when they do it—seems that only children weep. Goodnight†. This shows how even Atticus knew what was destined to happen and what will happen after that for time to come. The main thing Scout learns in this is to have a better perspective on things. On page 159 Atticus talks about how they made Walter go into there shoes â€Å"your children last night made Walter Cunningham stand in my shoes for a minute. That was enough†. This was important because gave her a glimpse of how someone could be in her shoes for a problem. Another example of time was on page 222 when Atticus told Jem about Bob Ewell spitting in his face, â€Å"Jem, see if you can stand in Bob Ewell’s shoes a minute. I destroyed his last shred of credibility at that trial if he had any, to begin with. The man had to have some kind of comeback, his kind always does. So if spitting in my face and threatening me saved Mayella Ewell one extra beating, that’s something I’ll gladly take†. This example not only teaches her about being in someone elses shoes but also shows how to be selfless. The final example which actually shows that she learned the lesson on p age 283 and she said â€Å"Atticus was right. One time he said you never really know a man until you stand in his shoes and walk around in them. Just standing on the Radley porch was enough†. This shows how Atticus taught her a lesson that is brought up a bunch in the story. You learn a lot in school but most of the time you learn the most valuable things outside of school and this story is no exception. She learned that you shouldnt let rumors control you, that sometimes you have to suck it up and just deal with a problem and to look in others perspective. You can be really book smart but the most important kind of smart is street smart because of your only school for so long.

Thursday, May 14, 2020

Spirituality in Shakespeares Hamlet Essay - 2389 Words

Can anyone possibly deny the spirituality within the Shakespearean tragedy Hamlet? Yes, some literary critics do. But most critics agree with the contention of this paper – that there is considerable spirituality present in the play. In his essay â€Å"Hamlet: His Own Falstaff,† Harold Goddard sees that Hamlet was made for â€Å"religion† and several other purposes: He [Hamlet] was made, that is, for religion and philosophy, for love and art, for liberty to â€Å"grow unto himself† – five forces that are the elemental enemies of Force. And this man is called upon to kill. It is almost as if Jesus had been asked to play the role of Napoleon (as the temptation in the wilderness suggests that in some sense he was). If Jesus had been,†¦show more content†¦(40) In his Introduction to Modern Critical Interpretations: Hamlet, Harold Bloom finds the Bible in this drama: Horatio, then, represents by way of our positive association with him; it is a commonplace, but not less true for that, to say that Hamlet represents by negation. I think this negation is Biblical in origin, which is why it seems so Freudian to us, because Freudian negation is Biblical and not Hegelian, as it were. Hamlet is Biblical rather than Homeric or Sophoclean. Like the Hebrew hero confronting Yahweh, Hamlet needs to be everything in himself yet knows the sense in which he is nothing in himself. (5) The first soliloquy, or â€Å"act of talking to oneself, whether silently or aloud† (Abrams 289), occurs when the hero is left alone after the royal social gathering in the room of state in the castle of Elsinore. He is dejected by the â€Å"o’erhasty marriage† of his mother to his uncle less than two months after the funeral of Hamlet’s father (Gordon 128). His first soliloquy emphasizes two religious/moral themes: the corruption of the world at large, and the frailty of women – an obvious reference to his mother’s hasty and incestuous marriage to her husband’s brother: O, that this tooShow MoreRelatedEssay about Hidden Spirituality in Shakespeares Hamlet2169 Words   |  9 Pagesthe author of this essay, the obvious presence of considerable spirituality within the Shakespearean tragedy Hamlet. The purpose of this paper is to identify and elaborate on selected spiritual elements in the play. Not all critics appreciate the spirituality in Hamlet. A.C. Bradley’s Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear and Macbeth presents a different interpretation regarding the presence of spirituality within the play: For although this or that dramatis personaRead MoreWilliam Shakespeares Hamlet Essay751 Words   |  4 PagesWilliam Shakespeares Hamlet Hamlet might well claim to be Shakespeares most famous play because of its language and the charm of its central character. Shakespeare wrote some thirty-eight plays. Taken individuallyRead MoreLiterary Criticisms of Shakespeare’s Hamlet Essay1234 Words   |  5 Pages This essay will discuss several literary criticisms of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. After skimming through several articles, I ended up with four peer-reviewed journal articles, each a different critical perspectives of the play: feminist, psychoanalytical/freudian, moral, and new historicism. My previous studies of Hamlet, as well as my rereading of the play this semester, has collectively given me a general knowledge of the text. My familiarity of the play made it easier for me to decipherRead MoreEssay about Indecisiveness in Hamlet839 Words   |  4 PagesShakespeares Hamlet is truly a great play to analyze. It is also unique in that a play based on revenge we dont see any action until the end. Hamlet has immediate suspicion and proof of his fathers murder and does not act. This poses the question, why does it take so long for Hamlet to kill Claudius? H amlets apparent indecisiveness to act is due to his constant habit of over thinking in addition to several conscious and subconscious distractions. Immediately following Hamlets conversationRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1470 Words   |  6 PagesHamlet was composed by William Shakespeare, first performed in July 1602 and first published in printed form in 1603. An inherent tension between confrontation and resolution is revealed through Hamlet’s characterisation within Shakespeare’s play. It is evident that there is a significant level of internal confliction that contributes to the amount of tension. Conflicted emotions, in relation to Hamlet’s morals and beliefs, cause a distinct increase in tension, yet recognition of ones human natureRead MoreWhat Does T.S. Eliot’s the Waste Land Tell Us About ‘Modern Spaces’?1445 Words   |  6 Pagesany logical sense because of the abstract elements that help make up the overall style of the structure. Intertextuality is evident in the poem because it references other poets, although there is a sense of critique in some of these indicati ons. Spirituality is evident in the poem too because of the aftermath of the World War, which is the main reason for ‘the wasted land’. Industrialism brought out critique from Elliot because it involved decimating people’s livelihood through their connections withRead MoreRevenge In Hamlet Analysis988 Words   |  4 PagesMurder, incest, revenge! This is Shakespeare’s Hamlet. If lovers of literature are asked to make a list of some of the greatest works of literature, undoubtedly, Hamlet would be near the top. Hamlet, an intriguing and complicated character, has been studied by lovers of literature and psychologists alike. It is an interesting examination of human behavior. To set the scene, prince Hamlet’s father has been slyly murdered by his uncle. His father’s apparent ghost comes to him and asks him to avengeRead MoreEssay on Hamlet -- Spirituality1865 Words   |  8 PagesHamlet -- Spirituality  Ã‚        Ã‚  Ã‚   Does the Shakespearean drama Hamlet represent a strictly secular writing, or does it veer into the spiritual dimension from time to time? This essay will delve into the spiritual side of the play.    In   â€Å"Judgment in Hamlet† Gunnar Boklund discusses the spiritual dimension of the ghost of King Hamlet:      It is a commonplace to refer to Hamlet’s â€Å"dilemma† and a critical problem to explain in what this dilemma consists. A natural way to come to termsRead MoreThe Spiritual Dimension of Hamlet Essay2181 Words   |  9 PagesIs there a religious dimension to the Shakespearean tragedy Hamlet? Yes indeed. And many literary critics attest to this. This religious dimension will be the subject of the present essay. In his Introduction to Modern Critical Interpretations: Hamlet, Harold Bloom finds the Bible in this drama: Horatio, then, represents by way of our positive association with him; it is a commonplace, but not less true for that, to say that Hamlet represents by negation. I think this negation is Biblical inRead MoreThe Death Of Hamlet By William Shakespeare Essay2134 Words   |  9 Pagesin return for a wrong; returning evil for evil, vengeance† (Webster Dictionary). This play introduces Hamlet, a prince who goes on the quest to take revenge on his uncle who killed his father and Hamlet won’t rest on until he gives his uncle the punishment for killing the king. But this quest for him to get his revenges has some consequences that could lead to many deaths including himself. Hamlet thirst for revenge clouds his judgements, which leads to drastic consequences. The feeling of revenge

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Innate Ideas Essay - 653 Words

Innate Ideas Throughout the passage of time, philosophers have written and discussed many topics in philosophy. Sometimes, these philosophers agree on ideas or sometimes they make their own assumptions. There are two philosophers who had different ideas concerning where innate ideas come from and how we get these types of ideas. Rene Descartes and John Locke were these two philosophers with the opposing argument on innate ideas. The place where Descartes discusses his views were in the Meditations on First Philosophy and Lockes argument is located in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. By using these sources I will be able to describe the difference between these two arguments on innate ideas. Rene Descartes was a†¦show more content†¦He specifically says he didnt draw it from his senses. He didnt make the idea of God he says the idea was imprinted on him. He makes the conclusion by stating, Thus the only option remaining is that this idea is innate in me just as the idea of myself is innate in me. God imprints the innate idea of Him on us at birth and that is why we know of God. An example of this is how a craftsman imprints his signature on his work. Descartes says he gets innate ideas from God because God instills the idea of himself onto us, which is an innate idea. The next argument on innate ideas comes from John Locke. He was a British Empiricist who believed in Imperialism. Imperialism means what is available to the senses. Lockes ideas come from the furniture of the mind-you dont come to earth with an idea; you are a blank tablet ready to absorb any idea that comes your way. Locke believes that ideas come from the senses. He states that you will see the world how it is unless something is wrong with your senses. The way you know the world is from your senses. He says in his argument that principles and ideas are not innate. As you live on the earth you get ideas through life experiences. If people believe that innate ideas exist, tha t must mean that there are innate ideas. Locke says there are two candidates for innate ideas: the law of identity (A=A) and the law of non-contradiction which means a thing is A or itShow MoreRelatedInnate Ideas Essay1444 Words   |  6 Pagestruth, Descartes used only his logic to identify his existence. He also proved that there is some type of knowledge that we are born with. â€Å"Some of our ideas seem to be â€Å"born with me,† some â€Å"invented† by me, whereas others â€Å"come from without† (Descartes, 2008, p. 211). Which means Descartes believed that we enter this world with some innate ideas that overtime helps us to develop understanding of our sense (invented by me) and through our experiences (comes from without). Descartes was a dualist;Read More Plato and Lockes Views on an Innate Idea Essay2118 Words   |  9 PagesPlato and Lockes Views on an Innate Idea      Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   What is an innate idea?   This can be defined as some idea or mental representation that is produced by outside perception or created anew by our imagination. It exists in the mind in virtue of the nature of the human mind.   According to Plato most if not all of our knowledge is innate. However, John Locke feels that we do not have any innate ideas.   Then the question arises of who is right or are they both wrongRead MoreThe Existence Of Innate Ideas1275 Words   |  6 Pagesthe late 17th century. In Book 1 of An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, he presents many ideas of knowledge and its origins. He rejects the existence of innate ideas and proves his beliefs with many arguments, one being that â€Å"universal consent proves nothing innate† (Locke 630). Another argument is that children and idiots do not have this knowledge imprinted on their minds, which must prove innate knowledge to be nonexistent. I disagree with Locke because I believe we all have immortal soulsRead MorePlato, Locke, And The Question Of Innate Ideas1829 Words   |  7 PagesPlato, Locke and the Question of Innate Ideas Plato and Locke have opposite opinions on the matter of innate ideas. Plato argues that the recognition of truth in reality is derived from the recollection of truth in the soul. A necessary part of Platos argument is that recollection of Truth depends upon the existence of an immortal soul. Locke, on the other hand, rejects Platos argument by stating that the recognition of truth is not dependent on recollection but is rather self-evidentRead MoreLeibniz And Locke s Nature Of Innate Ideas1827 Words   |  8 Pagesargued back and forth about the nature of innate ideas and whether or not they could/do exist. Locke took the position that in order for innate ideas to exist, they must be universal and universally assented to by all people. Leibniz counters by distinguishing between contingent and necessary truths, pointing out that no amount of experience will give us insight to necessary truths and that they must be innate. He also brings up the example of innate moral knowledge th at most people know withoutRead MorePhilosophy: Do We Have Innate Ideas? Essay1491 Words   |  6 PagesDo we have innate ideas? Offer your view with reference to the work of Descartes and Locke I understand the concept of innate ideas alone means ideas that presents our mind at birth. Descartes and Locke both have their own views about innate ideas and their arguments are completely different to each other and the question remain to the human knowledge. Do innate ideas really exist? Descartes does not put experiences to his philosophy like the other philosophers, Bacon and Hobbes. He believes thatRead More Measure for Measure Essay: Immorality and Corruption1576 Words   |  7 Pagesdemonstrates that there is an innate immorality and corruption in the heart of man. Shakespeare illustrates that power does not cause corruption.   This is achieved by presenting the Duke, who has the most power in Vienna, as a moral hero, and conversely revealing the corruption of the powerless class through characters including Pompey, Mistress Overdone, and Barnadine.   Through all this, Shakespeare uses Lord Angelo in Measure for Measure to show that immorality and corruption is innate in mankind. ItRead More Measure for Measure Essay: Lord Angelos Hypocrisy1514 Words   |  7 Pagesmankinds corruption is not necessarily born by power, but rather already innate in humanity. Shakespeare argues that power is not a producer of corruption by presenting the Duke, who holds the most power, as a moral hero, and conversely revealing the corruption of the powerless class (through characters like, Pompey, Mistress Overdone, and Barnadine).   Shakespeare uses Lord Angelo in Measure for Measure to show that corruption is innate within mankind whilst Angelo is a symbolism for pharisaical fanaticismRead MoreThe Summary of and Response to â€Å"the Trouble with Talent† by Kathy Seal911 Words   |  4 Pagesthe Japanese kids still kept on their work. Stigler stated that Asian education focused to the hard work which they believed that is one of the important factors to gain successful things. Whereas, Americans thought that achievement was produced by innate intelligence. Moreover, Stigler researched the math-test scores between American and Asian schools and realized that the scores of Asian school were higher than the scores of American schools as a result of working hard. Also, Seal asserted AmericanRead MoreContemporary Civilizations : An Essential Part Of An Individual s Highest Level Of Achievement1461 Words   |  6 Pageslevel of achievement is primarily influenced by their internal nature and only secondarily reinforced by external circumstances. Teresa’s argument contradicts this idea. Since the purpose of this course is to discuss texts reexamine the values on which we establish our communities, it is crucial to incorporate these contradicting ideas within a shared conversation. Teresa de Cartagena’s writings are an essential part of the Contemporary Civilizations curriculum because she contradicts her predecessors

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Scenario Amin †Sample Essay on Citations and References

Question: Write an essay on citations and references do not count towards the word limit, but quotations do.Analyse the article/case study from the perspective of at least two different classical ethical theories, one of which must be that of "Just Consequentialism". Present well reasoned arguments for your assessments and recommendations.Write an overall conclusion that justifies your recommendations made in your essay.Include a Reference list at the end of your work, in the correct APA referencing style, corresponding to in-text citations. Answer: Scenario - Amin Sthapit has been murdered by Roy Abanales Tabalbag in Sydney Australia (Begley 2015). The motive of this murder is that Roy AbanalesTabalbag found her former girlfriend having sex with Amin Sthapit at the time of his absence which is completely illegal. Since few months, Roy AbanalesTabalbag was suspecting that her girlfriend is involved with someone else (Begley 2015). He was tracking her girlfriends phone from last few months. Her girlfriend, Geecy Rebucas cancelled her cooking school lecture and called Amin Sthapit while his boyfriend was not present (Begley 2015). Then he came at the flat and caught her girlfriend cheating on him. Therefore, He lost his self control and murdered Amin Sthapit with the chefs knife (Begley 2015). Stakeholders As a result of this incident, three people have been mainly affected. These three people are Amin Sthapit who have been killed, the murderer, Roy AbanalesTabalbag and Geecy Rebucas who was caught by Tabalbag while having sex with Amin (Begley 2015). Ethical Issues All of the stakeholders have done several ethical issues. These are as follows, First of all, Geecy Rebucas, former girlfriend of Roy AbanalesTabalbag has cheated on her boyfriend, with whom she was in a relationship for 4 years. She hide the fact from her that boyfriend she was involved with another guy named Amin Sthapit (Begley 2015). On the other hand, the Amin Sthapit also made an ethical issue or a wrongdoing by keeping an illegal relationship with someone elses girlfriend (Begley 2015). Roy AbanalesTabalbag murdered Amin Sthapit by losing his self-control which is a non-ethical issue. Non-ethical Issues the murder done by Roy AbanalesTabalbag should not be regarded as unethical as the most unethical incident has been occurred with him. As a result of which, he lost his self control and murdered Amin (Begley 2015). Consequences Three of the stakeholders of this scenario may face several consequences. The murderer, Roy AbanalesTabalbag would be penalized due to the crime like murder. As a consequence of the non-ethical issue made by Amin Sthaper, he was killed by Roy AbanalesTabalbag. As a consequence of the non-ethical issue made by Geecy Rebucas, he lost her boyfriend and she has become alone (Begley 2015). Ethical Analysis Consequentialism It is the class of the normative ethical theories those hold the fact that the consequences of the conduct of an individual are the actual basis for any judgement regarding the wrongness or rightness of that conduct. As per the theory of Consequentialism, the judgement would go against the murderer, Roy AbanalesTabalbag as he has done the major crime (Scheffler and Scheffler 2014). He murdered Amin which is actually considered as the biggest crime (Carlson 2013). However, judgement can be made in a sympathetic way. On the other hand, Amin has lost his life therefore; justice should be made with respect to this particular theory (Aguilar, Brussino and Fernndez-Dols 2013). However, according to the theory, Geecy Rebucas would not be penalized as she did not make any direct crime. However, she was involved in a serious unethical activity (Berker 2013). Just Consequentialism this particular theory mainly emphasizes the consequences or the issues obtained due to the policies within the justice constraints (Brand 2013). The fact of this theory can be reflected in this scenario (Peterson 2013). Therefore, it must be said that along with Roy AbanalesTabalbag, the former girlfriend Geecy Rebucas should also be penalized as she has also done a crime by breaking trust of Roy AbanalesTabalbag (Levy 2014). Thus, this judgment should be made based on the moral aspect. Options First of all, Geecy Rebucas should not break the trust of her boyfriend, Roy AbanalesTabalbag. Amin Sthapit should not come between the couple as he knows that both of them are in a serious relationship. Geecy Rebucas should not hide her feelings about someone else to her boyfriend. Most importantly, Roy AbanalesTabalbag should not do that crime of murdering Amin. Roy AbanalesTabalbag can go with the legal procedure. Conclusion After the entire analysis as well as discussion made in this discussion, it can be said that people have to be very careful about the ethical as well as the unethical aspects of any activity made by them. According to both of the theories such as Consequentialism as well as Just Consequentialism, all of the suggestions should be accomplished by Roy AbanalesTabalbag, Geecy Rebucas and Amin Sthapit. All of these recommendations could be proven as very much effective for three of them. This is because, if three of them would follow these recommendations therefore, such crime like murder would not be taken place. However, people should learn some crucial leanings from the outcome of such critical scenario. People should do everything in an ethical way. The unethical activities always results in several troubles to the people who actually accepts the unethical activities. People should also remember that if any unethical activity is taken place by someone thus, then he or she should alway s be ready to face the penalty as a result of that wrongdoing made by him or her. Reference List Aguilar, P., Brussino, S. and Fernndez-Dols, J.M., 2013. Psychological distance increases uncompromising consequentialism.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,49(3), pp.449-452 Begley, P. 2015.Amin Sthapit murder trial: accused Roy Tabalbag 'provoked' into killing girlfriend Geecy Rebucas's lover. [online] The Sydney Morning Herald. Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/nsw/amin-sthapit-murder-trial-accused-roy-tabalbag-provoked-into-killing-girlfriend-geecy-rebucass-lover-20150601-ghdzge [Accessed 30 May 2016]. Berker, S., 2013. The rejection of epistemic consequentialism.Philosophical Issues,23(1), pp.363-387. Brand, J., 2013. Beyond Consequentialism.Philosophical Review,122(4), pp.657-661. Carlson, E., 2013.Consequentialism reconsidered(Vol. 20). Springer Science Business Media Levy, S., 2014. The Failure of Hookers Argument for Rule Consequentialism.Journal of Moral Philosophy,11(5), pp.598-614. Peterson, M., 2013.The dimensions of consequentialism: Ethics, equality and risk. Cambridge University Press. Scheffler, S. and Scheffler, S., 2014.Rejection of Consequentialism. Oxford.